From: peterson_at_d...
Date: 2001-04-14 00:58:21
Again I would like to share my response to a back-channeled query 
with the group. I was asked about peak performance protocols, and 
replied:
I'm not really an expert in the peak performance area, and I suggest 
that you repeat your query to Rob Kall in the buildcheapeeg group and 
see what he has to say. I think he knows more than I do, since he 
focuses pretty heavily on the whole EEG area, whereas I'm a 
psychologist who mostly uses alpha-theta training with post-traumatic 
stress disorder and other clinical cases. However, I'm glad to share 
what I do know. First, a technical point: entrainment is not the 
same thing as training. Entrainment devices, such as light/sound 
machines, hemi-sync tapes, etc. induce the brain to put out the 
desired frequency patterns (for as long as the stimulus is 
presented), whereas biofeedback training involves teaching the person 
to put out the desired pattern at will. 
For peak performance, alpha training is no doubt the most common as 
well as the simplest. I seem to recall that the Colorado State 
Patrol made Lexicor PODs available to their troopers and found it 
very useful, although I doubt that they continued to offer it after 
the study was done.
If you have a BrainMaster, it has the side-by-side bar display that I 
mentioned in one of my postings. Anna Wise wrote a book called "the 
High Performance Mind" in which she discussed how to use this pattern 
in training for various purposes, including different kinds of peak 
performance. In fact, if you can get the two sides of the display to 
look symmetrical, that is synchrony: both sides of the brain doing 
the same thing. If you can get the two alpha bars to stick out 
further to the right and left than the beta bar above and the theta 
bar below, that is enhancing alpha synchrony. The Wise book is quite 
widely available, and I believe I saw it in a paperback edition not 
too long ago. I bet Borders or Amazon would have it.
The alpha synchrony/peak performance target might look something like 
this (If formatting differences don't turn the little diagram into 
garbage):
XX|XX	beta	
XXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXX alpha
XXX|XXX theta
XXXXXXXXX|XXXXXXXXX	delta
--Jim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:29 BST