From: Waldemar Neto (wpneto_at_o...)
Date: 2001-05-20 23:28:12
The use of 1989 standard C make the routine directly suitable
for Linux, ( beyond Windows and DOS ) .
Otherwise the effort to convert C++ to 1989 standard C is the almost
the same to vice-versa .
I think standard C is the best language for that purpose, but we could alsodo both ( driver do Linux ) and ( ocx or DLL for Windows ), in fact the difference is not large enough .
----- Original Message -----
From: Rob Sacks
To: buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2001 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: [buildcheapeeg] PC software
Here's a good article on best practices
and management of open-source
software projects:
http://www.advogato.org/article/262.html
One of the main requirements for a successful
open-source program seems to be documented
programming standards. The GNU standards
are an interesting model, although I don't think
we should adopt them outright because they require
the use of 1989 standard C:
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_toc.html
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
www.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
buildcheapeeg-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:30 BST