From: e_e_ling_at_h...
Date: 2001-05-31 19:04:31
Hi all
Just a couple of thoughts in response to Jiva's post.
1. I think the discussion on alternate solutions is slowing the
project down. The way I see it, this is a continually evolving
project, and I hope we will constantly develop ways of making our eeg
better and cheaper. However, it is important to set goals, and get a
working version out for testing asap. Otherwise we could analyse the
project forever, constantly thinking up better ways of doing this or
that... but never building a machine!
2. What are people going to charge for exactly? I'm not sure I
understand your post.
Regards
Eric
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, jiva_at_humboldt1.com wrote:
>
> * I know I helped begin all of the "alternate solutions" threads but
> I'm wondering if all this is interfering with getting an
> initial unit up and available for those who want it. Does the
> group need some focus?
>
> * A dilema of sorts seems to be shaping up here where all of the
> voluntary work of many people is likely to permit another group of
> people to charge $50-$150 "per session" for their efforts. Does
> this need to be addressed?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:30 BST