From: jiva_at_humboldt1.com
Date: 2001-06-09 17:32:57
>
> "You should probably coordiante with Joerg on this ... the remote
> leg/arm electrode seems to be integral to the design. And shielded
> cables sound highly desirable. (that is, it sounds to me like ur
> thinking in a bit different direction than hardware specs)."
>
> I had previously assumed that the "remote leg/arm electrode" was a
> reference electrode that could be replaced with an Au1-Au2 linked
> hookup, and didn't see the cable issue as relevant to the
> electrodes, so this posting led me to conclude that I was really >
> not understanding something.
While I may be the source of confusion, the design last posted
seems to use inputs from the channel 1 and channel 2 shields to
cancel noise. I've no experience here but it appears that the
electrodes use shielded cables between the unit and the
monitored subject. Thus the suggestion to touch base with Joerg
to sort all this out. In the past few days he said that
a twisted pair cable would make a second option.
semi-related: I emailed the folks with the training helmet and
reusable electrodes but got response. Possibly someone with
a PHD attached would get a reply.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:30 BST