From: jiva_at_humboldt1.com
Date: 2001-06-12 16:31:27
Maybe it could be kept in the lower rectum and burn methane
to generate electricity?
Somehow I feel we're drifting away from our initial design.
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, psytrix_v_at_yahoo.com wrote:
> Experimental Questions
>
> Hi HardW People,
>
> More questions to solve:
>
> In the below (former) case , if we use active electrodes (from
> Biosemi) would be possible put only the electrodes skull embedded ,
> and rest of the analog device (Pre+Amp) located a little far inside
> body (eg. abd.cav)( with non immunogenic coverage- like silicone ) ?
>
> That would dismiss the need of a very small device - but yet
> would be needed using batteries .
>
> Waldemar
>
>
> --- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, "Psytrix Yahoo" <psytrix_v_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hi tech people ,
> >
> > I need to know for what's the least size can be reduced the
> actual EEG (analog only) .
> > Is possible to reduce the voltage ( for using ubatterys) ?
> > I guess in the acutal board there's many capacitors to allow
> microchip "forging" (?) .
> >
> > The miniature aims to be skull embedded - that would better a
> lot our luck in get "legal hosts" -
> >
> > Please, answer ASP , ( that's a reply for institution
> proposition ) ,
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:31 BST