Re: [buildcheapeeg] Necessity of ir isolation

From: Moritz von Buttlar (info_at_baltic-microsolutions.de)
Date: 2001-12-12 02:55:14

• Next message: Doug Sutherland: "Re: [buildcheapeeg] Necessity of ir isolation"
• Previous message: michalchik_at_aol.com: "Necessity of ir isolation"
• In reply to: michalchik_at_aol.com: "Necessity of ir isolation"
• Next in thread: Doug Sutherland: "Re: [buildcheapeeg] Necessity of ir isolation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 16:59 11.12.2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>I still find myself disagreeing with the majority that feels that optical
>isolation is necessary for safety. I posted the following message to
>sci.electronics.design to get a second opinion on this issue. I will post
>the replies I get.

Interesting what will happen :) Maybe you can recruit some more people
there, too.

Moritz
---------------------------------------------------
Moritz von Buttlar
Flash uC/DSP Development http://www.baltic-microsolutions.de
Free EEG Design http://openeeg.sf.net

• Next message: Doug Sutherland: "Re: [buildcheapeeg] Necessity of ir isolation"
• Previous message: michalchik_at_aol.com: "Necessity of ir isolation"
• In reply to: michalchik_at_aol.com: "Necessity of ir isolation"
• Next in thread: Doug Sutherland: "Re: [buildcheapeeg] Necessity of ir isolation"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:33 BST