From: sademade (sademade_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 2001-12-22 16:23:12
> As someone pointed out earlier, making portable libraries for the
> signal processing etc is of highest priority. I would suggest coding
> those routines in C. Wrappers for VB, C++, Delphi, etc can be based
> on the C-library functions.
What would be the problem to produce those with Matlab and it's
C-generator Matcom ? No-one has answered what is problem with
that idea, as it should be fastest way to produce it fastest,
taking time out from having to fool months with it and do it
in days, instead.
Matlab and matcom is out there running on linuxes too, and once
generated, the code is royalty free open code, and C++. What
is the big problem with that, how is hand-coding the routines
from scratch as per some signal processing books faster, and
easier or more portable than C++ source code from mat+com ?
Definitely several of this list members would have access to
those tools, and could take the DSP/SP routines out of the way
in matter of days instead of months, that way, and all very very
portable. Tested and proven case.
Appreciate, Sade M.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:36 BST