first results with SDL

From: Joerg Hansmann (info_at_jhansmann.de)
Date: 2002-01-11 01:39:25

• Next message: sleeper75se: "Re: Input protection"
• Previous message: Joerg Hansmann: "Re: [buildcheapeeg]Patient Safety and Input protection"
• In reply to: Joerg Hansmann: "Re: [buildcheapeeg]Patient Safety and Input protection"
• Next in thread: sleeper75se: "Re: first results with SDL"
• Reply: sleeper75se: "Re: first results with SDL"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

here are the first results of experiments with SDL and comEEG:
(attachment: The inevitable 50uVp-p 10Hz calibration rectangle ;-) )

Unlike the allegro-based version that suffered from severe performance
problems, the SDL port behaves quite undemanding with 100Hz software generated sample clock and 44kHz 16bit stereo sound synthesis.
(only 20% CPU-usage, should be rather CPU-independent BTW.)

The signal seems to be rather free from glitches - a result I did not expect
under Windows (win98se).

Regards,

Joerg

• Next message: sleeper75se: "Re: Input protection"
• Previous message: Joerg Hansmann: "Re: [buildcheapeeg]Patient Safety and Input protection"
• In reply to: Joerg Hansmann: "Re: [buildcheapeeg]Patient Safety and Input protection"
• Next in thread: sleeper75se: "Re: first results with SDL"
• Reply: sleeper75se: "Re: first results with SDL"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:36 BST