From: John Morrison (jmorrison_at_ahc.net.au)
Date: 2002-01-23 15:07:06
> Hi all,
>
> just an idea on what threads to use, and where:
>
> There should be three threads, I think:
>
> 1. Data input, signal processing, protocol management and such
> 2. User interface (operator)
> 3. Feedback interface (patient/user)
>
> The first thread embodies (I love these fancy words. :-) the machine,
> the second the operator and the third the user. That's the most
> logical division you can make. If the timing is critical (as with the
> Roshi), some feedback functions can be moved into thread 1.
>
> If a scripting language is added later on, that is a fourth thread,
> because it would act as a second operator.
>
> What do you think?
>
> /Andreas
Yep doesn't sound to bad. :-) Good thinking
Just not sure if we shouldn't data input and processing there own threads.
After all the input maybe time sensitive and the processing MAYBE time
wasting!
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:37 BST