From: yaniv_vi (yaniv_vi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 2002-01-29 07:16:09
i have a little question :
is there a fast way to define a simple nfb software that could be
probably be used as future base ?
it doesn't have to be perfect , but just have to be a o.k. base .
solid base .
aren't there any sofware guru who can define such a spec fast ?
sincerly yaniv v.
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, "John Morrison" <jmorrison_at_ahc.net.au> wrote:
> > Or perhaps John's approach is better, just having a sort of wish
list and
> > then trying to prioritize. I just think that might become
harder to
> > coordinate in the long run.
>
> We could combine the 2 ideas.
> The brainstorming/wish list is to give some idea as wot what
people want.
> The results could then be passed into a formal process (as you've
described)
> and get a good piece of code produced.
>
> :-)
> John M.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:37 BST