From: John Morrison (jmorrison_at_ahc.net.au)
Date: 2002-03-03 12:58:13
Andreas
Are there any drawbacks to Sourceforge over Yahoo?
I totally agree that software should be developed on Sourceforge with all
the additions that makes it what it is!!!
BUT
We will loose those that THINK they have nothing to offer in the
development process and all that we will be left with is the programmers.
We need "normal" user input on this type of software! :-)
As Rob said we should actively hunt out professional users and get comments
as we develop or before. But with the absence of pros at least we should
get as WIDE input as possible.
OK here is a crazy idea, is it possible to link yahoo and source forge and
have the best of both worlds???
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sleeper75se [mailto:sleeper75se_at_yahoo.se]
> Sent: Sunday, 3 March 2002 10:37 PM
> To: buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [buildcheapeeg] Re: Software discussion
>
>
> --- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, Jim Peters <jim_at_uazu.net> wrote:
> > Shall we take the software development discussion over to the other
> > list ? I think <EEGS_at_yahoogroups.com> was originally setup for this
> > purpose, and many of us are already subscribed to it.
>
> Maybe we should move the whole thing (hardware and software) over to
> Sourceforge? (Bye bye Yahoo.) It does not matter much to the hardware
> design, but software collaboration is best done with version
> management like CVS.
>
> /Andreas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:39 BST