From: yaniv_vi (yaniv_vi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 2002-03-14 14:07:00
hi andreas
yeh, after some time spent on moving apartment , new job , bla bla
bla , returned to this group .
about portability :
first my asumptions on the embedded version :
the version would with either only audio feedback , or simple gui .
the portability issues of course won't include graphic interface .
(after the emails from gorge von hilsheimer , i think that even with
simple interface a nfb machine could be very powerfull ) - so linux
might not be necessary .
so still , if i don't want to use linux on the embedded version
there would be still some issues open:
what language would be the pc software ? what language would be the
embedded software ?
my best guess on the embedded software is c .
so any simple ways of porting from c++ to c? and from java to c ?
are there any real time issues ? i don't know of any , assuming are
processor won't be lazy :)
anyway , i want to start doing something on a usefull basic version
both for embedded and pc that would have basic capabilities ( why
pc ? isn't rob's version enough ? no it's lacking a little option of
both training for increasing a band and decreasing other band .
)
so please group - guide me !
sincerly yaniv v.
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, "sleeper75se" <sleeper75se_at_yahoo.se> wrote:
> Hi Yaniv, nice to hear from you.
>
> The simple answer is yes, if the embedded system can run Linux and
> comes with a serial port... or perhaps IrDA as well, I think Moritz
> is working on that. I have a half-finished USB solution on the
> drawing board as well, but it won't be done anytime soon (spreading
> me too thin... ARGH! :-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:40 BST