Re: [buildcheapeeg] EDF and DDF file formats

From: Dave (dfisher_at_pophost.com)
Date: 2002-03-14 19:37:18


On Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:43:28 -0500, Sar Saloth wrote:

>As long as the record doesn't need to be completely assembled before
>transmission starts, would there be a difference between "bursts" and
>continuous? That is the only problem that I see with EDF for data
>transmission - since all of the samples for one channel are grouped
>together, you can't send out the samples until you essentially have all of
>the samples in the record. As you state, if everything is at the same
>rate, 1 sample could be one record and we are all the way there, we don't
>need to assemble the record before starting to send it.

That's why I don't see EDF ever being a communications protocol, only a storage
method.

Dave.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:41 BST