Re: [buildcheapeeg] Re: Sound Card-Phase II

From: Waldemar Neto (wpneto_at_o...)
Date: 2001-05-19 15:36:20


Ok Joerg , thanks for information - one thing yet : if we plan to use the cheapEEG for real-time analysis purposes ( in Laptop or Desktops ) - like evoked potential task or EEG walking holter - does RS232 get too slow ?
Sometimes I have already problems using (until ) parallel connection !

Regards

Hi,

----- Original Message -----
From: Waldemar Neto <wpneto_at_o...>
To: <buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 19, 2001 3:07 AM
Subject: Re: [buildcheapeeg] Re: Sound Card-Phase II

FOR "DATA ACQUISITION PEOPLE"

I've done ( 10 years ago) an analog-device converter using the simple ADC808 ( for 8 inputs-MUX ) and it worked well ,
saving other kinds of processes (PLL or VCo) - the cost was less than $ 30 ( higher than sound card ).
It can use the exact frequency one wants - ( taking a proper crystal clock , or dividing the absolute value ) .
I shall have the pcb yet . What do you think ?

Instead of a ADC808 on a PC slotcard as a replacement for a soundcard, itwould be more favourable
to use the existing RS232EEG-design, that uses an AT90S4433 Processor with integrated 6 channel
10-bit ADC.

Joerg



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:30 BST