From: frans smith (f.smith_at_c...)
Date: 2001-06-09 07:06:32
I don't know if i'm correct, but to me it seems that this project
has a history. that is, the brainmaster project. it was don before,
so there are people on the list who should know.
but on the other hand, i thinks most people on the list (like me)
want to have a working device to work whit, or to build software.
----- Original Message -----
From: jiva_at_humboldt1.com
To: buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 4:42 AM
Subject: [buildcheapeeg] Re: some issues
> 2. Well, Moritz brought up the name issue again. I think we really
> have to decide what to do about the term "eeg". Specifically, does
> a product need to be certified in order to bear the name "eeg"? We
> really need to find this out, or we will have to change the name.
I like the argument that it's an eeg machine (it is) but it isn't
a medical device. (as per thermometers, etc)
> 4. I feel there is a danger of taking too much of a long-term view
of
> things here. We are discussing certification, the possibility of
> getting sued, etc... important topics, but all these things are a
> long, long way off. I feel we should concentrate on finishing a
> workable system, getting some machines made for group members to
> test/play with, and then take things from there. I think it's safe
> to say that nobody in this group will sue the group!
While I feel we do need to look ahead, I agree that we need to
concentrate on getting a a working device. Using the "kit",
"experimental", "not for medical use", et al disclaimer it would
seem ok to follow in HAL's footsteps. How to help the hardware folks
accomplish this is the question.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
buildcheapeeg-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:30 BST