Re: a question to serious people , including doug ,jim-p, jim-m and others

From: tralad (ldean_at_metrowerks.com)
Date: 2001-12-05 18:23:00


Yaniv,

...
>
> > this eeg should be both pc based and standalone.
>
> There are no standalone features yet, so if that is
> a requirement, then you need to spec those out and
> decide. There is an issue, this was mentioned by
> Joerg, it takes a lot of processing power to do any
> serious spectral analysis, and that is needed to
> provide good feedback. So I think you need to do some
> serious analysis on whether the standalone EEG idea
> is even feasible. Yes it's doable but with what
> results? How beefy of a processor do you need on
> the standalone unit to do the analysis. A PC version
> is simpler because the EEG only does data acquisition,
> all analysis runs on the PC. I actually think it will
> be harder to make a good standalone unit. And all
> things considered it might not be cheaper.
>
...

For a good standalone unit, it might be best to use a DSP
microprocessor. Then you could get away with less general
functionality and really focus on the specific functionality you
need. However, I'm sure it will be cheaper to connect to a PC than to
try to do all the processing with a standalone unit (unless you
happen to have a DSP board lying around <grin>).

Laura



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:33 BST