From: Brian Earle (bearle_at_tompkins-co.org)
Date: 2001-12-05 14:09:13
Organization: Totally Disorganized
To: buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com
From: Doug Sutherland <wearable_at_earthlink.net>
Date sent: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 07:46:05 -0800
Subject: Doug for President, 2 Channels, PC based!
,jim-p, jim-m and others
Send reply to: buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com
I've wired myself to some of the top-shelf eeg software in the
clinical setting. And I agree strongly that 2-channels would be far
superior to one. Doug wrote:
> The cost for going 2-channel is not a lot more that
> single channel, so don't assume that 1-channel is the
> right answer. I think market research needs to tell
> the tale here. How many people want 1-channel EEG?
> How many would pay a few extra bucks for 2-channel?
> People tend to compare with the competiton and make
> their choices. So who is the competion? What features
> do they have? How do you differentiate yourself?
I also agree with Doug that:
> A PC version
> is simpler because the EEG only does data acquisition,
> all analysis runs on the PC. I actually think it will
> be harder to make a good standalone unit. And all
> things considered it might not be cheaper.
Brian Earle
Tompkins County Mental Health
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:33 BST