From: yaniv_vi (yaniv_vi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 2002-01-28 17:52:21
hi
what about testing vs a software simulator ?
it could be easily built , and very usefull for testing .
also you can test inside matlab or some tool like this .
why you have to have h.w. ?
yaniv
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, Jim Peters <jim_at_uazu.net> wrote:
> Moritz von Buttlar wrote:
> > If you want to build something that works and don't want to
wait -
> > build Joergs RS232EEG (download from www.jhansmann.de). It has
some
> > limitations but principally works great. But I would build the
> > complete design, not only the input stage.
>
> Look -- I'm not an electronics guru, and I've already tried to find
> the AVR parts once and failed. I just want something I can put
> together relatively easily as a temporary solution until the
designs
> are fully tested and finalized.
>
> Can someone point out to me a good tested input stage that I can
build
> without etching anything or programming any microcontrollers and
which
> will work as I hope (for basic testing using soundcard input), or
else
> give me a good reason why I should forget it ?
>
> Given my lack of electronics skills beyond soldering and using a
> multimeter, I'm looking for the shortest path to getting something
to
> test with, with the lowest chance of me making a mistake I'll not
be
> able to detect or fix.
>
> The least number of unknowns the better, and for me etching and uC
> programming are unknowns, and my sound-card input performance is a
> known. I reckon I can build and test an analogue circuit if
someone
> can recommend one.
>
> Once I have something basic working then I can get back to coding,
> which is how I can help the most, I think.
>
> Jim
>
> --
> Jim Peters (_)/=\~/_(_)
Uazú
> (_) /=\ ~/_ (_)
> jim@ (_) /=\ ~/_ (_)
www.
> uazu.net (_) ____ /=\ ____ ~/_ ____ (_)
uazu.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:37 BST