From: John Morrison (jmorrison_at_ahc.net.au)
Date: 2002-03-09 03:19:45
> >They have all been part of the discussion and I'm now working
> with Dave on
> >code based on the design we've worked out up to this point!
>
> Well, what I sent you was not based on that discussion, but can
> be used and reworked to match it, because it is not too far off. The
reason that code
> exists stems from my own particular needs. But I think that when you
interact
> with it, it will stimulate your own OO thinking processes, and that you
will
> present some OO design ideas that we can then move forward with.
> I would love to see a definitional set of classes and a description of
what
> they know and do rise out of this interaction. Then all of us here can
refine and
> rework it until something truly solid and foundational emerges, as Doug so
> aptly pointed out as a necessary need.
Sorry Dave I didn't mean to take any ownership for your code!
It was my mistake!
> Dave.
:-)
John
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:40 BST