From: yaniv_vi (yaniv_vi_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 2002-01-30 07:16:53
hi
there also another issue of security . wireless etc .
you can solve coding but more complications .
sincerly
yaniv
and by the way , i'm not sure the h.w. part is so easy , because you
deal with rf . it's needs to be checked if we would like to be done.
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, Joel Eriksson <jen_at_ettnet.se> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:37:19PM -0000, sleeper75se wrote:
> > --- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, "Andres Calderon" <andresfc_at_ideam.gov.co>
wrote:
> > > Can be Bluetooth a good alternative for (wireless) isolation?
> >
> > Hi Andres,
> >
> > sure it is. However, there is a major problem: It would increase
the
> > complexity a great deal.
> >
> > If you feel like it, look into how much it would take to design a
> > general purpose data link over bluetooth... not an easy or cheap
task
> > I think. Hardware is probably not a problem, but software is,
unless
> > someone is sitting on an open-source bluetooth protocol-stack...
>
> Actually, there are several open source bluetooth protocol stacks
> for Linux. Affix, AXIS OpenBT and BlueZ are the ones I know of. I
> don't know how complete or how portable any of these are though
> but at least they could be used as references when making a new
> implementation.
>
> I don't think it's worth the effort doing this now though, the
> bluetooth technology should probably evolve a bit more first.
> Did you know that Ericssons BLIP (a bluetooth access point)
> cannot (or at least, could not) communicate with Ericssons
> own bluetooth capable phones.. :-)
>
> > /Andreas
>
> --
> Joel Eriksson
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:37 BST