From: Oli Scheit (Oli_at_scheit.de)
Date: 2002-07-02 16:33:04
> that it won't be obsolete after a short time due to optimization
> of the hardware layout.
Think of this as "absolutely completly obsolete" after a "very short time"
due
to "major improvements of the hardware layout".
Of course I am aware of the nature of such projects.
I just wouldn't want to spend $150 for PCB 1.0 on Monday and discover
PCB 2.0 beeing released on Wednesday. Although even this wouldn't bother me
as long as nobody would tell me that my "brandnew" 1.0 is just of no use
at all...
regards,
Oli
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marv Miller" <marvm_at_dimensional.com>
To: <buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:37 AM
Subject: RE: [buildcheapeeg] Re: estimate
> It's been my experience that there's always a better board version for the
> future...it's the nature of thinking persons to keep on creating...Version
> 1.0, Ver. 1.1, Ver. 1.2, Ver. 2...etc. Maybe it would be a good idea to
> realize that's the nature of the beast and to both "modularize" with that
in
> mind, and, stand back and scope this sort of think out a bit. Now's the
time
> to do that, not later.
>
> Surely a design could be implemented...from both the construction and
> implementation side...that would have some foresight into later evolution.
> I'm not sure what that might be, since I'm neither an electronics
specialist
> or a technical EEG whiz. Such things as the interfaces with the outside
> world (computer, sensors-electrodes, packaging, etc.) could be thought
about
> and brainstormed in advance, and the results rolled into the architecture.
>
> And, alas, as is the nature with technos...we're always gonna be leaping
> over ourselves with "better" stuff. Thinking some of these things through
in
> advance can extend the life of products before the "newer-better" teases
us
> into the future. And, it's easier on the wallet too.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oli Scheit [mailto:Oli_at_scheit.de]
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 10:32 PM
> To: buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [buildcheapeeg] Re: estimate
>
>
> I'd go for it if the price is moderate and if you guys are sure
> that it won't be obsolete after a short time due to optimization
> of the hardware layout.
>
> btw.: I'm new to this group. Hi, everybody! ;-)
> I highly appreciate what you're doing and I think this is a really
> interesting project.
>
> regards,
> Oli
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "salamander" <andrew_at_salamander.net>
> To: <buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 11:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [buildcheapeeg] Re: estimate
>
>
> > i'd be interested.
> >
> > cheers,
> > andrew
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Just a little question for the group: how many would be interested
in
> > > a pre-assembled ModularEEG? At first, just the naked PCB.
Eventually,
> > > in a box, *if* the costs are reasonable. I'm not taking orders or
> > > anything, just asking so Olimex can get an estimate of how many
units
> > > they can expect to make.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Andreas
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > buildcheapeeg-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> buildcheapeeg-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:44 BST