From: peterson_at_d...
Date: 2001-06-20 17:56:48
--- In buildcheapeeg_at_yahoogroups.com, "frans smith" <f.smith_at_c...> wrote:
> hi all,
> Cannot follow (my american is not that good)
>
> Does this mean no one may practice biofeedback ?
> If so, whats so good about it ?
> It would be better to make it possible for everyone to
> follow courses in BFB, as wel to becom educated in bfb
> to become a practionar. without having a master degree first.
>
> What going on with Linda Kirk ? anyone knows, i guess
> she's against the idea that biofeedback is accessable for
> everyone.
>
>
Frans--
As I read Dr. Strohmeyer's message, the original proposed law (which
would affect New York State only) included a provision that would
have restricted the use of biofeedback for clinical/medical purposes
to psychologists, but this provision was removed, so other qualified
people would also be able to practice biofeedback.
I think it is important to distinguish between clinical and non-
clinical (for example, educational) uses of biofedback. Some kinds
of biofeedback, including some kinds of EEG biofeedback, really do
require the involvement of people who have an advanced understanding
of the brain and of psychological and behavioral issues. It is
appropriate that this kind of treatment be done under the supervision
of licensed and/or certified professionals. On the other hand, there
are other kinds of EEG training, such as peak performance training
and some kinds of attention training, where one is not trying to
treat a diagnosed disorder, that should be available to the general
interested public.
Actually, my personal preference would be for a system in which
prospective users of EEG biofeedback are informed and warned about
the potential risks and benefits, are advised to seek professional
consultation where appropriate, and ten left to do what they will at
their own risk.
Jim Peterson, Ph.D.
Licensed Psychologist
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : 2002-07-27 12:28:31 BST